Mike Snider had an article in USA Today May 5 in which he reports that Trump’s FCC Chairman Aji Pai still insists that Obama’s 2015 Net Neutrality rules have interfered with broadband investment in rural areas or certain low income neightborhoods. Indeed, on one day trip in the fall of 2015 I saw lots of road signs in a rural area in the Virginia Blue Ridge offering broadband.
The article goes on to criticize Pai’s claims, noting in particular that ATT’s acquisitions have skewed the results. And Pai has taken other actions which might have impeded some rural access.
But it is reasonable to think that neutrality rules could interfere with new hardware in some cases.
The video embedded with the article makes a disturbing speculation, that without net neutrality an ISP would slow down a “basement blog” in favor of Facebook. But of course, the basement blog might require relatively few resources (Wordpress can require more), where as an HD video streaming service legitimately could “need” more bandwidth, which could be paid for.
It’s interesting for me to remember that in the early days my own legacy sites always loaded very fast because they were straightline HTML and used few resources.
For example, this long chapter from my first DADT book (48000 words) on an old legacy site loads in less than one second on Xfinity right now. You can try it at home. But it took three seconds on my iPhone 6. It loaded fast before net neutrality, even in the early days of high speed.